The following is a guest post from Rob Myles, member of the Matsunami Board of Education and a contributor at Cracked.com
A long time ago, as these stories often begin, man cut his moorings with the earth and travelled the skies. Some time later, those fortunate few were chosen to pioneer the vastness that lay outside our small world, to plumb the depths of space as only science fiction novelists had done before. Now, the final frontier is opening up to the wider world, and civilian corporations are taking an interest in “space tourism”.
Of these, perhaps the best publicized is Virgin Galactic. To the potential consumer the buzz surrounding this project, the X-Prize and SpaceShipOne leading to the suitably futuristic looking SpaceShipTwo project, has turned a lot of heads, filling them with hope of a childhood dream come true in the process.
This is an easy project to believe in the feasibility of. It’s a combination of mediums, granted, but both are suitably large departures from the ancestral heritage to make them the logical next step in technological development, enabling us to take that one step further.
Richard Branson is also keen to point the environmental impact of his civilian space project will be drastically reduced from the rockets of the soviet days or the shuttle launches we’re all familiar with, a small craft strapped to a titanic fuel tank some twice the length of the craft itself. A lightweight craft, using a shorter rocket burn, with far less volatile fuels, it seems consumerism has forced human creativity to overcome the obstacles government institutions overcame with simple force.

Which is why it is disappointing to see some of the competition have been somewhat less inspired in their attempts to reach space. EADS Astrium has entered the new space race with a design that doesn’t quite inspire the same confidence.
In case this looks familiar, it’s probably because at a visit to the airport or while watching a Hollywood film, you’ve seen a Learjet 45 in your lifetime.
The only apparent addition EADS Astrium intends to use to make this spaceworthy is a giant rocket exhaust on the hind quarter. It’s almost as if EADS Astrium have taken a page from L. Ron Hubbards book, or at least South Park’s interpretation of it, in which alien spacecraft are described as “DC3’s with rockets attached to them”. Forgive our scepticism here, but it seems almost like a backward step from the smooth, artful optimisation and creativity of the X-Prize winning design to simply make a Jetsons-esque photoshop of an existing craft that will suffer from all the difficulties of the original space launches- launching from the ground, heated re-entry, mass/fuel distribution, and so on. It also proposes to carry only four passengers to the SS2’s six, doubtless increasing the price-per-person on each flight.
With the SS2 ticket prices being ballparked at around $200,000, creating a less efficient, more expensive version seems fruitless, both for EADS Astrium and the corporate competition that forces these ventures to excel. While EADS Astrium claims it will match the $200,000 ticket, it’s scheduled to debut in 2012, 3 years later than the SS2 begins doing business, by which time it will have recouped most of its losses. While an exciting new prospect, it is important to urge caution in cases such as this. Perhaps the most compelling evidence we can provide is the difference between promotional videos. Advertising is how the company sells its product to the consumer…
We like Pixar Animation as much as the next, but when it comes to believing in the feasibility of civilian space tourism, EADS Astrium has left us with nothing but a lacklustre arched eyebrow, and a Learjet with a rocket attached:
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4DFx0O9AtyY&hl=en]
$200,000 then, is the price for your flight into space. If Green Living is important to you, ride a bike to work and forego buying yourself and the wife the $100,000 Tesla Roadsters you were planning on, and celebrate your next anniversary with a trip into space.
Of course, there are other alternatives. For instance, Unicef claims, “$1 protects a child from measles for life. Measles is lethally infectious. It is still responsible for 750,000 child deaths annually.” Four SS2 passengers could wipe out measles related deaths worldwide for a year. And so, we ask again. Civilian Space Travel- But At What Price?
Links: http://www.astrium.eads.net/families/space-tourism and http://www.virgingalactic.com



3 responses so far ↓
1 Jose // Mar 25, 2008 at 10:00 am
Huh. Interesting topic, but I’m not entirely clear how you feel about it, except it seems evident that you don’t like the SS2.
While it is arguable that the money could go to something more immediately worthwhile, exploration has always been a cornerstone of human imagination. Probably we should stop subsidizing the war on drugs and use THAT money on measles.
2 sciencesays // Mar 25, 2008 at 2:08 pm
Well, while I can’t speak for how Rob feels about it, I know my only strong feelings towards commercial space travel are that they be environmentally responsible. It’s amazing to me to hear how much junk the various government space programs and commercial satellites have left up there, waiting to rain down on us, and it makes me sad to think we’ve trashed our near-space the same way we tend to trash our environment.
You certainly have a point about the importance of exploration, and while they’re not necessarily going new places, they’re providing the opportunity for other people to go there. As far as how the money should be spent, in my mind, that’s up to the investors who put their money into this project, and any customers who would be willing to pay for it - it’s their money.
However, it’s not their space, just because they’re the only people who can afford to go there, and I hope that they’ll have the foresight to manage their impact, and that the government will step up and make sure they keep those promises.
Thanks for your comment! - Jeff
3 Rob Myles // Mar 27, 2008 at 5:36 pm
The SS2 is the superior of the two options, the EADS Astrium space flier is the subject of the most criticism. My position is merely that the cost of civilian space travel is astronomical, and while it does capture the imagination, it fails to be accessible enough to lead to anything more than disappointment for the vast majority of we Earthlings. This is not helped when the competition for SS2 is so underwhelming (as competition is the chief method of bringing prices down).
In addition, I hoped to show that despite the SS2’s advertising campaign focussing on the efforts made to minimise the environmental impact, it still has the effect of consuming vast sums of money and, quite literally, blasting it into outer space. A small share of this money- indeed, less than a single flight full of tickets- can do great amounts of good for those who can’t even live on earth, much less travel to space. Given the huge popularity of the SS2 venture (having taken tens of millions in deposits years before its first commerical flight) it is my implication that Virgin Galactic should look toward charitable donation and philanthropy once their initial costs are covered, as the massive sums of money needed to rid nations of disease are miniscule in comparison to the money made from a single SS2 flight.
Thanks for your comment!- Rob
Leave a Comment