The presentation of Emma Bidamon: I have wanted to begin my participation realising a very brief introduction in which I will mention to them that tonight they accompany to me, since they have been able to observe a group of women with which it unites a very singular bond to me, I dare to say to them that hardly a similar situation can be found throughout history to which, by divine mandate, it has corresponded to us to live. Each of us we have been united in the sacred bond of the marriage, to share our life with the same man not even, sealed and enmudecidas by the secret that we had to accept under agreement of not being able to disclose it to anybody, to our own family, under penalty of being the condemned to undergo but the cruel punishments, punishments, that hardly the human mind is able to imagine. One of the hardest and traumatic experiences than a woman can support throughout all their existence, under the yoke of a union celebrated in Santo Templo by the power of the priesthood, this life and all the eternity. ng for or against this. In the personnel, Emma comments to us, I have felt from always a firm rejection to this infamous practice of the plural marriage, in several opportunities severely I have been admonished reason why a rash act of revolt was considered against aims of the Creator and an arrogant attitude that defied the patriarchal authority of my husband. This that I mention as a introduction constitutes the reason or the reason by which these ladies have decided to accompany to me and to share with you their experiences of life. I try to go to them so relating the facts what has happened, doing without all type of valuations that can have a subjective or tendentious character, has not been this one my form to face the life and I do not have the smaller intention to make innovations now.
Archive for November, 2015
The time is controlable. Form clans; it selects his relatives by marriage. Between the velveteen and most competent, the vernacular manager, very frequently is decided by first. He tends to be authoritarian, controller and centralising. Its motivation and anxieties of being able do not feel to taste with the delegation of functions. It wants empires, horizontal as as much vertical.
The more important social necessity is also the looked for reward more. One surrounds by structure and bureaucracy. The structure offers a security sensation; the bureaucracy protects and accompanies. He is excessively operative. It is inmiscuye in the operations and it neglects the strategies. On the one hand, its eagerness takes to control it to become jumbled in everything; on the other hand, the operations, by their specific characteristics, are the ideal activity to obtain immediate rewards. He is territorial.
It protects his department or its section of the external influences, watches over its subordinates and it does not share information with his pairs. Its motivation of being able is against the opening necessity. It tends to repeat the past. The change resists. The future he is risky, the change also. Its approach of planning is intuitive and unreliable person. When he designs strategies, he tends to contaminate them with unreal expectations. He does not know the errors, he looks for guilty and he suffers the critic. Its externality prevents him to accept mistakes; like unique person, the critic does not resist. It looks for the spectacular thing; one becomes bored increasing with it. It persists little. It tries to obtain results with a few glorious blows, and from one day to the next. Their loyalty and its identification are concentrated in the people. The organization, the company or the ministry are not but representations of the individuals direct that them. He is shared in common with his people. The institution is not motivation source.
Its passion persistence cost some money for it and its son, whom they had needed to open hand of lunches to be able to carry through that work. The painter passed for financial difficulties, but she did not leave to paint. When finishing the screen of ' ' Supper of Cardeais' ' , as its dimension was improper for what it demanded the regulation, a friend suggested that the painter cut the head of one of the cardinals and concurred with this part of the screen. Guiomar if denied to mutilate its workmanship. In the hour of the judgment, the men would have to raise its cane to confirm the acceptance of the work. All the canes had been raised.
Some time later the picture was bought by the Brazilian government, that of it made gift for Portugal, being changed by the sword of D. Peter I. Today the picture if it finds in the Museum of Lisbon. Another ticket, of the famous painter, who illustrates the difficulties of the artists of that time was when Guiomar Fagundes knew that its picture Bay in the Quitandeira, that it had sent for a hall in Italy, met in customs, in a lot to be auctionzed. The painter had that to buy all the scrap iron of the lot to be able to save its workmanship, making use of its few economies.
When carrying one from its celebrities and delicate nakeds of Paris to Florena, where it would go exp it, it was barred in customs to declare the value of the screen. As the author wise person not to say price the authorities had said that in that country it was very valuable, taxing a superior amount to the possibilities of the artist. Not obtaining its release, exactly showing that it was of its authorship, it did not obtain to pay the cited tax, having that to cut it in straps to get rid itself of the incubencies.