Aristotelian Logic

Aristotle promoted a revolution since the advent of Socratic thought, especially as apodictic reasoning or analytical philosophy (also used the nomenclature), to be completed through a local mental functioning indisputable intuition, the influence also infected support the above arguments is defined as the Platonic and Socratic dialectic maieutics. Thus, Aristotle, now on a new basis, the philosophy that jumped. The argument became more direct and therefore more objective, for likely scenarios that have not generated a host of additional questions (such as the above methods) to ensure the safety of the logical conclusion. Clearly, however, that the success of Aristotelian logic is much more visible in the exact sciences, especially in mathematics (which portrays eternal and immutable truths.) Become feasible in natural science itself, the endless and long speeches which fought a fierce battle to prevail as "acceptable" and, finally, it seems was the temper tantrum aimed at persuasion over all (kind of reasonable, but more vague concept, with content determined by history , by tradition, culture of a community). The logic was presented at that time as a break with previous philosophers. Converted to pure logic, and not because of the strong emotional appeal (the tantrum), often in the heat of debate, dialectics, and maieutics present. The new thinking of Aristotle, in the words of Umberto Eco, marks the beginning of the indisputable logic of deduction, instead of the rhetoric that is proposed, therefore, as a technique designed to drag the listener. Despite the criticism saying the art of persuasion has not changed at all, would only logical that with the increase of technical innovation of the deduction, to be named as subtle fraud.

Comments are closed.