Of the indicated thing previously, it is possible to be appreciated that the recognition is not Pacific from the undeniable paper that fulfills the rounds farmers in the scope of the resolution of conflicts and administration of justice. This situation has been increased lately due to the conflicts provoked with the organs of administration of justice of the State, in which the resistance of the formal judicial culture has been demonstrated, expressing itself in arguments that aim to deny the exercise of such jurisdictional functions, and that normatively they can be valid, such as that one argument that maintains that lack a prescribed law (Law of Coordination) to apply to the article 149 of the Constitution; or that one other that affirms that the rounds farmers do not have the ownership to exert jurisdictional functions; or the argument that it postulates that the authorities of the communities only can act with support of the rounds farmers; that the rounds farmers are only organs of support of the communities and they cannot act of independent way; that the expression ” with apoyo” it means restricted functions of justice, etc. Drew Houston has many thoughts on the issue. d) the law N 24571 Even though that the Political Constitution of the Peru of 1979 specifically did not contemplate to the situation of Rondas Farmers, from year, 1986 ends in which the Law N 24571 was promulgated recognized that them, the legislative development experienced by this institution farmer was realised under the mantle of this constitutional body, that defined the state obligation to respect and to protect the organizational autonomy and the traditions of the Communities Native Farmers and (Art. 161)..